OTHER
|
Really (and it can not be otherwise) the things
are very more complicated: the trial that, beginning from the original
drawing (maquette)
it will bring to the issue of the definitive stamp, it can be interrupted
in one any of the passages for the most disparate reasons.
Sometimes, the cause that is at the base of this
missed realization of the stamp intervenes in the initial phases of this
complicated trial and therefore we will have the maquette
only to testimony of this.
If instead it come to the final phases, we can
also have the varied typologies of Proofs or Essays and even the indented
stamp in its definitive appearance.
There are manifold causes at the base of this
"change of rout" from the Post Office Department: more or less macroscopic
errors in the dates brought on the vignette, in the inscriptions, in the
facial value (this can also suffer variations for rate changes),
in the represented subject; other times it doesn't exist some error of
departure but simply an expediency reason (political or social circumstances,
etc.) that it dissuades to adopt a determined subject in the stamp.
A famous instance is the stamp of France that
have for subject the ship "Pasteur", whose issue was solicited by the President
of the Company of the South-Atlantic (that he had commissioned the ship)
on the occasion of the inaugural cruise, in the September 1939; in the
August 1939 they were printed 4 million stamps with 70 cent. facial value
(fig. M6).
Because of the entrance in war from France, the
event was annulled (September 2 nd 1939) and the ship was destined to other
purposes.
Finally, in 1941, it was decided to overprint
in red all the sheets of the stamps (that they had been set aside) with
the value of 1 Fr. + surtax of 1 Fr. (this surtax was required from the
admiral Francois Darlan, State Secretary for the Navy, in favour of the
Central Service of the Navy Works (SCOM) (fig.
M6a).
Naturally, as it always happens, a limited number
of the original samples survived to the destruction.
Another famous instance of Unissued
stamp is the tall value (50 Fr.) of 1936 air
mail of France, that show a plane over Paris (fig.
M7).
Again, the 1949 stamp of France that commemorated
Emile Baudot (the inventor of the rapid telegraph): the stamp, in dark
brown color, introduced an error in the Baudot's birth date (1848, while
that correct was 1845) (figg. M5, M5a);
the Postal Administration, noticed the oversight, withdrew immediately
the incriminated stamps replacing them with the new ones (of slightly more
clear color).
Another important example of Unissued
is the 1975 Béquet's Marianne of France (0,80 Fr.) (figg.
M12, M12a), that would have to replace the analogous issued stamp of
the same value.
In conclusion, I will quote the set of 4 values
of 1952 Morocco air mail, all Unissued stamps,
that represent a plane over the General Leclerc's monument, in Temara
(figg. M8, M8a, M8b, M8c).
We will speak of Unadopted stamp when the manufacture process is interrupted in its initial phases or when, between more proposed drawings, the Postal Administration discards some of these preferring another one that it will keep wholly the long course that will bring it to become an issued stamp.
We will speak instead of Unissued
stamp when the trial is interrupted in the
final phases or, straight, when the stamp has already gone out in to configuration
that we can define "definitive one" but to the last moment it is withdrawn
from the circulation to be destroyed (figg.
M1, M2), (fig M5),
(fig. M6), (fig.
M7), (figg. M8, M8a, M8b, M8c).
In this second case it exists a stamp in the
proper sense of the term with all the varied Proofs that precede it.
Generally, the number of these Unissued
stamps that it escapes to the destruction
and it come to the philatelic market (besides in the Postal
Museum) it is very limited, even if, as a
rule, any specimen should survive.
In substance we can say that, in the general
lines, some represented subjects will never receive the approval for different
reasons and their run it will be interrupted in a precocious or late phase
according to the cases.
Other times, the represented subject will come
simply modified in more or less substantial way but it won't be entirely
erased; in this case, therefore, the "ended product" (definitive issued
stamp) it will have only partially the initial project appearance.
To the 1st group they belong the Unadopted ones and at 2nd the Unissued. Summarizing:
|
|
artist A |
|
drawing A |
|
|
||||
|- | artist B |
|
drawing B |
|
|
|||||
|_ | artist C |
|
drawing C |
|
|
|
|
|
definitive
issued stamp |
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
definitive
issued stamp |
||||
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
xxx (for various reasons the trial is interrupted in this stage and doesn't originate any stamp) | ||||
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Unissued
stamp (*) |
||||
|
| |
|
|
|
(the opportune corrections are introduced) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
definitive
issued stamp |
(*):
the not issue of the stamp it can be determined by different reasons as
the change of the postal rate and therefore of the facial value
(figg. M1, M2),
for errors in the drawing or in the dates (fig. M5)
or in the writings, that escape to the precedent controls.
In some of these cases, the Unissued stamp,
even if it is arrived to the final phase of the print process, it will be discarded
despite the opportune changes that has been adopted (of the facial value, of the errors of date,
etc.); in other cases, on the contrary, it will follow a really issued
stamp with the introduced changes (fig. M5a).
In this last case, therefore, it will be realized the Proofs e/o the
Essays of both the stamps (issued and Unissued one).
We can have Unissued and Unadopted in all the stages that characterize the production of the stamp: departing from the